Why is Fedora atomic not more secure? It is literally immutable. Which kills the concept of persistent malware, unless they archive a complex exploit chain to gain root and install a malicious package and then reboot into the new iso, which is easier said then done.
LeTak
Computer Science student, happily self-hosting everything that fits into Docker on 10-year-old hardware. GNU/Linux user and Python learner. There is always a more creative way to break your software/hardware that you can’t imagine. GameCentral/Schwarzfuchs
old account : @LeTak@lemm.ee
- 0 Posts
- 6 Comments
Privacy or Security? Security would be something like Fedora Atomic. Privacy (and security?) QubesOS , TailsOS But as Linux is FOSS, you can just take any distro and form it as you like.
I used Nessus for a while and I heard that OpenVAS could be a good FOSS alternative to it.
LeTak@feddit.orgto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Must fight temptation to buy an overpriced raspberry pi
51·11 months agoOh and the i2c etc stuff, I connected ESP32 and other microcontrollers over USB.
LeTak@feddit.orgto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Must fight temptation to buy an overpriced raspberry pi
151·11 months agoI have an old pentium laptop N3520 with 4GB DDR3. I removed everything and put it in a receiver box 1U size. It consumes so little energy that it can run 5-7 hours from its battery (I call it build in USV). Last time I measured 3-7w. Also passiv cooled , no noise. Another machine I use , is with a i7 4770 with 16GB for Proxmox, 7-20w , peak is much higher but rarely used , only on boot and vm startup.


I completely forgot secureblue. But it was not worth the hassle for my working environment