While post body contains control flow, it can be simple arithmetic operation instead and it will lead to the similar result, so not the control flow itself causing this. It seems more complex closure blocks some optimizations here, thus quicksort having less instructions. I suspect that complex closure was outlined to a separate fn, and not copied to quicksort anymore.
Folks , if you have any thoughts , please do share
"-C", "link-arg=-lstdc++", "-C", "link-arg=-lsupc++", "-C", "link-arg=-lgcc_s"
good catch!
rustix - take a look, thx.
no_std was my deliberate choice. -C prefer-dynamic - it feels that it may be a more fragile option and add some hassles with cross compiling - something like error while loading shared libraries: ... so I have to provide libstd.so as well together with binary to rpi … where is the gain?
Thx , if you have any ideas please don’t hesitate to share
Anyway, the idea is interesting. I’m using flight radar currently to track my flights.
Not trying to criticise, just sharing own opinion - it is better if ugly, but written by human, than polished by llms You write code, yes sometimes it is ugly, messy, but you learn this way
it seems some problems with gif display, so duplicating here
it seems some problems with gif display, so duplicating here
FAQ : why? It’s an experimental approach to ordinary todos. There are plenty of good tools like taskwarrior, but their features are hardcoded task body is huge — you either dig through hundreds of features to find what you need, or something you need is too niche, so it will make no sense to hard code it for devs. So, I decided to try a different approach as an experiment: keep the task model super simple (id,title, status,calldata), but let tasks have executable instructions. That way almost any custom behavior becomes possible — tasks depending on other tasks, tasks modifying other tasks or creating new ones, recurring, self-deleting tasks, task that monitoring new tasks creation and creates alert task, or increase priority of older tasks etc. The tradeoff is complexity for flexibility, like vim/helix vs zed or atom. To make that work a tiny virtual machine is needed and a set of opcodes. So this vm can be a basis for some todo app.
Vm is like a program that accepts instructions and returns result. In my case this program manages everything task related based on instructions. So you can combine instructions to program behaviour you need. Why ? Alternative is todo apps with hardcoded features. With task vm you can have 4 crud primitives, while each task can have own behaviour
I’m using it since 2018 or 2019. So it is a pure coincidence.
yeah, I agree that there are definitely valid uses for clone(). I included it at the top of my table with a bit of humor, hence the smile. Thanks for pointing it out! ^_^
Looks great!
I took some cpp examples as guidance. As for geek for geeks agree, one shouldn’t blindly trust it and better use several sources. Adding more reliable sources is definitely point of improvement. I also used introduction to algorithms paperback book, but was lazy to add it as a source _
UX / design, it looks very similar to twitter for me, ie you have text field like in twitter where you write your memo and can use tags. So visual similarity mostly
thank you! Oh. it seems user is blocked on lemmy.ml or something like that, so i cannot participate in this discussion or even see the post and answers within my instance.
Since I cannot reply where, you can post my reply if you wish: 2 points: