What you list as disadvantages are exactly the main benefits of a federated wiki. For a contentious subject which can be interpreted in multiple ways, there should be multiple different articles which present these views. It can be possible to represent other viewpoints if they share a common root, but as soon as there is a fundamentally different understanding that breaks down.

Additionally, even a very large encyclopedia like Wikipedia cannot include all topics that users want to write about. For example when it comes to TV series, books or details about small places, it often doesnt meet the notability requirements and gets removed. So for these topics people need to use entirely separate platforms like Fandom (which are full of advertising). Ibis can allow all these topics to be present in a single network, accessible from a single user interface.

Thank you, fixed!

To decide if I should merge the linked PR or not (I did merge it).

Thats even more verbose so the second option is better.

@DemocratPostingSucks@lemm.ee @Deebster@programming.dev @al4s@feddit.org Thanks for the feedback! Personally I prefer the first option, but based on your comments I will merge the PR with the second option.

As a workaround you can go into the database and query directly for users with rejected application and email provided. Then write a script to email them. Getting a fix developed, reviewed, merged and deployed will take a few days in the best case. And even longer now because we are busy with lots of things.

Tools written in Rust are generally both performant and correct (few runtime crashes or other programming bugs). There arent many other languages with this combination of advantages.

Maybe sled: https://crates.io/crates/sled

Try putting it as a link in a text post instead.