• 5 Posts
  • 173 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 17th, 2023

help-circle






  • They really suck to use in Firefox

    In Chromium browsers you get “Open tab in group” in the context menu when you tap & hold a link, which makes a tab group if your current tab didn’t already exist in one, then add the link as a new tab in the group.

    In Firefox, you don’t get that option in the drop down menu. You can only open a new, completely separate tab. To make a tab group, you have to manually combine 2 tabs, and if you want to add tabs to the group you have to make them outside of the group first and add manually.

    Also, in Firefox you can’t remove tabs from a group without closing the tab.

    After getting feedback and suggestions on how to make tab groups worthwhile, they promised to add the fixes in either 155 or 156. It’s looking like we’ll have to wait until after 159 for the fixes.

    And I’m already not a big fan of Mozilla at the moment. I recently switched phones and found out that they only let you sync bookmarks between devices if you have an account with them and sign in.

    Brave browser doesn’t require a sign in for sync. They let you sync E2EE’d by connecting individual devices without an account similar to Syncthing



  • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.workstoLinux@lemmy.ml•Why not LLMs?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    A single repo hub doesn’t want to host LLM-generated code. It’s not like there aren’t others that are friendly to LLM-code, including the largest one: GitHub. And GitHub will never ban LLM code, they’re too integrated with it. And Codeberg is just a specific Forgejo instance. Nothing is stopping you from hosting your own if you really want to.

    You’re taking a single instance of a provider adding an extra stipulation to their TOS and equating it to governments banning the use of LLM’s. It’s not, and the government isn’t going to be taking away your LLM. Quit acting like it is.


  • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.workstoLinux@lemmy.ml•Why not LLMs?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    This is the exact opposite. Trying to ban AI from everything despite its use cases.

    This is a pure, bold-faced lie. But this is nothing new from AI evangelists.

    This is about banning AI contributions from specific open-sourced projects. This is due to a number of legitimate concerns that are still not solved, such as maintainability and how AI development legally interacts with licenses such as the GPL

    You want to go and start an open sourced project that uses AI from the start? Go ahead, nothing is stopping you. You want to install AI programs on your OS? Go ahead, nobody is stopping you

    But don’t cram that bullshit into the OS itself. Doing so then forces AI onto everybody whether they want it or not, and that’s bullshit


  • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.workstoLinux@lemmy.ml•Why not LLMs?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    18 days ago

    We’ll stop when the AI evangelists finally learn the idea of consent and quit trying to force AI down everyone’s throats nonstop.

    You want to shrivel up your brain with AI? Go ahead, you’re an adult (presumably) and I’m not your mom. Go access it through a browser or separate app. Quit trying to force it into my face by integrating it into the OS or DE. And while you’re at it, quit continually going “BuT dId YoU cOnSiDeR tHiS???1?” like a door-to-door salesman that jams their foot in the door so you can’t close it