They’re all searching for “solutions” but nobody is creating them. Funny how most of the people complaining about systemd aren’t actually system devs themselves and thus have no clue what they’re talking about.

Nobody (not even GNOME) is actively wanting to force systemd and keep out alternatives, there just aren’t any proper alternatives offering the same kind of functionality and quality.

What is your reasoning for not just using capital letters where grammar requires it? I agree with OP, it makes it very annoying to read the way it is now.

The distros aren’t the problem, the DE’s are. Otherwise yeah agreed 😉

Ok but you’re talking about Cinnamon. Cinnamon’s Wayland support is experimental sure, but that doesn’t mean Wayland itself is. I mentioned KDE Plasma and GNOME because they are the ones using Wayland for the longest now and have the best support for it and there it works better than X11.

Yup, that’s the exact same problem I had. And I heard more stories of people having this problem. It’s bad…

I had the same display failure, but 4 times in about 9 months. It made me pretty done with the whole thing. I only got the laptop back from the repair centre 2 or so weeks ago but I have no faith the issue is properly fixed now. Let’s see how it turns out, if it happens again I’m going to throw this thing out of the window.

Wayland hasn’t been experimental for a while. Both KDE Plasma and GNOME have defaulted to Wayland for a while now indicating it’s ready to be used. And in fact, scaling works better on Wayland than on X11 but I suppose ymmv.

I have the AMD edition and overall the laptop is nice but since I received the laptop about 9 months ago the screen broke 4 times. I only got it back 2 or so weeks ago from the repaircenter so I have only been able to actually use it for a few weeks. So my experience is pretty terrible so far. I honestly have no faith the screen is durably fixed this time but let’s see, I’m pretty done with it.

Distrobox is Toolbx but more portable (packaged on basically all distributions) and supports way more distributions as guests. I recommend using that if not on Fedora or you want to run a different guest than Fedora.

It’s off right now.

Also, inxi? Better use uptime, that command is actually available on all systems and literally exists to check uptime.

Yes

I personally rent the cheapest VPS I could find and put Tailscale on it. My server at home then connects to that Tailscale network and the VPS runs nginx acting as a proxy forwarding everything to the server through Tailscale.

Besides having no annoying networking issues it also has the benefit that I can move houses without having to update A records to have the domain point to the new IP address because the VPS IP ofc remains the same.

The reasons for choosing Musl over glibc are largely unrelated for choosing a service manager. You can want one without the other just fine.

In general (there are exceptions) containers do not use service managers at all. They start 1 command and that’s it.

I mean, it is. RedoxOS is just that. But it’s not Linux and that means a lot of things.

I ran transmission and WireGuard for ages before I recently switched my server over to x86, worked fine?

Idk about Sdkman though, I don’t do Java development, but if it’s written in Java itself I fail to understand why it wouldn’t work 🤔

Alpine Linux: uses musl and busybox by default. Extremely lightweight. Some things will not work

I use it daily, which things won’t work? Honestly it’s “just a distribution”, you’ll have the same experience with it as OP has with Arch.

You can’t seriously call them “countries in North America” though, that’s just ridiculous.

Did you seriously just name Denmark a country in North America?!

Alpine Linux has no default DE, I’m not sure what you’re talking about. It’s up to the user to install a DE.