MaggiWuerze

Home Assistant has its own locally running voice assistant. There’s even hardware for it (think self hosted Alexa) that you can buy or build yourself

Yeah, the Steam update got me thinking MP was totally new, so I was planning to try that with some friends. Guess I’ll set up an B41 Server then, thanks!

Aaah, that makes sense. Thanks for explaining

Im kinda confused there. On steam the devs recently posted an update, that MP is now available, but it seems that it has been for a while?

Was it in beta up until now or was it fan made?

Why would your passwords be stolen? If you have a good master password you could pass around thumb drives with the database and noone would be able to acces them, wince they are securely encrypted. Having them on your phone makes no difference as long as you don’t leave your phone and password manager app unlocked and out in the open (which both actively warn you against)

Its also possible for a webserver to offer two versions of an API. Add a new one that needs authentication, mark the old one as deprecated and add a checkbox to disable it. Then clients can update to use the secure one and if you use and unmaintained client you can enable the old insecure api

And you think if Jellyfin were a comparable size, there wouldn’t be just as many or more?

basically protection racket

I would definitely recommend Immich then. I use it together with my wife and we both upload our photos automatically and create albums together. There’re also companion projects, that make sharing albums outside your household easier and safer.

I also run both but don’t see how Immich could be a replacement for Nextcloud?

log in on a local IP and not the network name and it’s working again. but I’ll be moving to jellyfin from now

after seeing this edit on the top post I felt like OP was not not really looking for input and instead jumped ship when he had to change a single setting after an update in a software he had been using for years

I’m not gonna waste my time explaining how software might change over time, if you think you’ll never have to touch your Jellyfin server moving forward you’re sure to be disappointed

Or you could properly configure your server to recognise local ips

if your mail server blocks them they won’t show up there I think. It just refuses to accept the mail. Maybe check Nexxtcloud logs to see what happens when it tries to send the mail

do they not get sent or do you just not receive them (eg because your mail server blocks them as spam)?
Do both come from the same address?
Can you try to format the testmail the same way to see if they still arrive?

Still better to have a team to react to this incident than just have them shrug and ignore it for 5 years

No, the worst is that a company like Sony or their lawyers can find my server and create a list of movies I offer and then sue me over it. I live in a country where lawyers make a living doing nothing but that.

Besides that, security by obscurity is the worst possible form and barely qualifies as security at all. It’s also another place where the Jellyfin devs leave their users to their own devices when it comes to securing the server against malicious actors.

And none of this is clearly communicated by the project. The unauthenticated endpoints are not disclosed, the issues with the filepath is not disclosed. People treat it as a drop in replacement for Plex, but people using it as such basically throw an unauthenticated server onto the open web

That’s simply not true. You can just set your local ip range as unauthenticated and use it to your hearts content without an internet connection.

You can access it through your local network without authentication. Add a vpn and you got the same setup Jellyfin fans will praise

Plex has a whole team dedicated to security. It’s obviously not perfect and it is a larger attack surface than Jellyfin, but I’ll take that any day over devs who treat security as an afterthought